Recommended Alternatives to Janitor.AI: User Reviews and Comparison

Sophia Miller
Sophia Miller

Updated: 2025-03-22

5 min , 1 views

With the rise in popularity of AI roleplay chat platforms, many users have begun seeking interactive AI websites that better suit their personal needs. Janitor.AI, one of the earlier players in the market, was once beloved by many. However, due to its high costs, overly long responses, content moderation policies, and recent platform changes, some users are now looking for alternatives.

In this article, we’ll explore the most popular alternatives to Janitor.AI, including their key features, ideal user types, and honest feedback from Reddit users.

janitor ai alternatives

 

01 Comparison Table: Top Janitor.AI Alternatives

Here are the platforms most frequently mentioned on Reddit, with detailed user feedback. These are considered the leading alternatives to Janitor.AI:

Platform Popularity Key Features Ideal Users Moderation Pricing
Xoul ★★★★★ (5+) Lorebooks, scene presets, clean UI Janitor users seeking more freedom No censorship Free + optional sub
Anime.GF ★★★★★ (5+) Short, concise replies Fans of Figgs, fast chat No censorship Free
FictionLab ★★★★☆ (4+) Strong logic and memory Users wanting logic and memory Some restrictions Free
OpenCharacter.org ★★★★☆ (4+) Open-source, community-driven Roleplay & bot customizers No censorship Free
Spellbound ★★★☆☆ (3+) Story-focused interaction Story-driven chat fans Some restrictions Free & paid plans
Chub.AI ★★★☆☆ (3+) Creative, unique responses Creative conversation lovers No censorship Free
Backyard AI ★★☆☆☆ (2+) Multiple models, lore support DIY AI experience seekers Some restrictions Free
Krush.My ★★☆☆☆ (2+) High-quality AI images & voice NSFW content enthusiasts NSFW allowed Paid ($25–$50/month)

 

02 In-Depth Review of Janitor.AI Alternatives

Now that we've compared the top alternatives at a glance, let’s take a closer look at each one. Below are detailed breakdowns of the platforms most frequently recommended by users — including their standout features, strengths, limitations, and real-world feedback from the community.

 

2.1 Xoul: The Closest Alternative to Janitor.AI

Overview:

Xoul is widely regarded as the most comparable replacement for Janitor.AI. It offers a similar user experience but removes content restrictions and introduces features like Lorebooks and customizable scenes for more controlled, immersive interaction. With a clean, intuitive interface and minimal setup, it’s especially appealing to users already familiar with Janitor.AI.

User Feedback:

“Xoul is by far the closest to Janitor.AI in terms of user experience. Clean interface, high-quality AI — very satisfied.”

PRO

  • Clean and intuitive interface, easy to use for Janitor.AI users
  • Supports Lorebooks and scene customization for tailored AI roleplay
  • No censorship — full freedom in conversation content
  • Free to use, with optional premium features

CONS

  • Recent major update caused occasional lags
  • Registration approval may take time (some users are on waitlists)

 

2.2 Anime.GF: Short-Form Style for Figgs Fans

Overview:

If you're not a fan of Janitor.AI’s lengthy AI responses, Anime.GF might suit you better. Created by a member of the Figgs.AI community, it offers short, snappy, and natural responses — ideal for fast-paced, casual interaction.

User Feedback:

“Janitor’s responses are just too long. Anime.GF feels more like chatting with a real person.”

PRO

  • Short replies that mimic human conversation
  • Uncensored — great for freeform chat
  • Completely free, no subscription required

CONS

  • Search function is weak — hard to find specific characters
  • Limited character library (still expanding)

 

2.3 FictionLab: Logic-Driven AI for Extended Chats

Overview:

FictionLab is known for strong logical consistency and excellent memory retention. It’s perfect for users who enjoy long, complex conversations where the AI remembers past interactions. Compared to Janitor.AI, FictionLab excels in dialogue depth and context awareness.

User Feedback:

“The AI actually remembers what I said earlier — that’s a huge improvement over Janitor.”

PRO

  • Superior memory retention and contextual awareness
  • Ideal for users who enjoy long-form, in-depth conversations

CONS

  • Some moderation is present, though lighter than Character.AI
  • Slightly formal conversation style may not appeal to everyone

 

2.4 OpenCharacter.org: Fully Open and Community-Driven

Overview:

For users seeking a completely uncensored and flexible AI experience, OpenCharacter.org is a strong choice. Driven by a vibrant community, it allows users to freely create and customize AI characters and their personalities.

User Feedback:

“The freedom here is unmatched. You can shape the AI any way you want.”
“Perfect for users who want to fine-tune their bots to specific styles.”

PRO

  • Fully open, no content censorship
  • Community-driven with strong support for personalized bot creation

CONS

  • Still a newer platform in active development
  • Quality of AI characters can be inconsistent

 

2.5 Spellbound: Story-Driven AI Interactions

Overview:

Spellbound is designed for storytelling and long-form narrative creation. Ideal for users who enjoy co-writing with AI or engaging in plot-rich interactions, Spellbound focuses less on casual chat and more on immersive fiction generation.

User Feedback:

“It’s more like an interactive AI novel platform than a chatbot — and that’s exactly what I was looking for.”

PRO

  • Focused on narrative-driven AI responses
  • Free version available, with premium upgrades

CONS

  • Not suitable for first-person conversational roleplay
  • Higher learning curve with more complex setup requirements

 

2.6 Chub.AI: Creative but Unconventional

Overview:

Chub.AI is known for its highly imaginative replies and unique language style. It's ideal for users looking for something different and less filtered. The platform encourages freeform, creative interactions — though its quirky tone may take some getting used to.

User Feedback:

“Chub.AI's responses are super creative, but sometimes it feels like it’s speaking weird alien English.”

PRO

  • Highly imaginative and creative dialogue
  • No censorship, ideal for experimental interaction

CONS

  • Language style may be too odd or abstract for some users

 

2.7 Krush.My: Best for NSFW Visual and Voice Interaction

Overview:

If you're looking for an immersive NSFW experience, Krush.My is a solid option. It supports high-quality AI-generated images and voice chat, making character interactions feel more vivid and lifelike.

User Feedback:

“It's a bit pricey, but if you're into NSFW content, it's totally worth it.”

PRO

  • AI-generated images of high quality
  • Voice interaction available, enhancing immersion

CONS

  • On the expensive side (starting at $25/month)
  • Some features are still under development

 

 

03 Why Are Users Switching from Janitor.AI?

Despite its popularity, Janitor.AI has faced growing criticism from its user base. Here are the most common reasons users are seeking alternative platforms:

REASON 1
Overly Long and Unnatural Responses

Many users have complained that Janitor.AI’s replies are excessively long, even after adjusting the generation settings. For users who prefer concise, snappy interactions, this can feel more like reading a novel than having a natural conversation. As a result, platforms like Figgs.AI and Anime.GF, which offer shorter message styles, are becoming more attractive.

User Feedback:

“Janitor’s AI talks way too much — it doesn’t feel like a conversation, more like the AI is writing a book!”

REASON 2
High Subscription Costs, Especially for GPT-4 Access

Another major concern is pricing. Users who rely on GPT-4 often find themselves paying $100–$250 per month just to keep using Janitor.AI. These high costs are pushing people to look for more affordable — or even free — alternatives that still offer quality interaction.

User Feedback: “I’m not paying hundreds every month just to chat with an AI. That’s ridiculous!”

REASON 3
Increased Censorship, Especially Around NSFW Content

Several users have noted that Janitor.AI has become more restrictive following recent updates, particularly when it comes to NSFW content. This has left some users feeling frustrated and limited in how they use the platform. Alternatives like Xoul, OpenCharacter.org, and Krush.My are now favored by those who want an uncensored experience.

User Feedback: “If they keep tightening the rules, Janitor.AI will become the next Character.AI.”

REASON 4
Policy Changes and Lack of Transparency

There’s also concern about broken promises and unclear communication from the developers. For instance, Janitor.AI once assured users that NSFW image descriptions wouldn’t be moderated — only to remove the feature later. Additionally, some users have raised red flags about hidden investor information and the platform’s financial stability.

User Feedback: “They said NSFW image descriptions were safe — now they’re gone. And I can’t find any info about who’s funding this anymore. It’s sketchy.”

 

04 Final Thoughts: Which Janitor.AI Alternative Is Right for You?

Choosing the right AI platform depends on your personal preferences and priorities. Here’s a quick summary to help you decide:

  • Looking for a near-identical replacement to Janitor.AI? Try Xoul.
  • Prefer short, natural dialogue? Go with Anime.GF, a favorite among Figgs users.
  • Need stronger logic and memory for long conversations? FictionLab is a solid choice.
  • Want complete freedom and no censorship? Check out OpenCharacter.org.
  • Interested in NSFW features with immersive interaction? Consider Krush.My.

Each platform brings something unique to the table. Whether you're after more realistic conversation, fewer restrictions, or enhanced storytelling features — there’s an alternative out there that fits your needs. Give them a try and find the AI that speaks your language.

Turn your photo into a fun AI video in seconds!

Kisses, hugs, transformations, and cool effects—no editing needed. Just click and create.

You May Also Like